Log in

View Full Version : The Season of OTC Abuse Has Begun


drdªv€
12-10-2005, 07:07 AM
Employers must also be concerned with the possible abuse of over the counter medication in their workforce. Over the counter medication has the potential to be equally abused just like any other illegal substance and can cause just as much physical, mental, social, and financial disruption. Because over the counter medication is so easily accessible and inexpensive, this makes it even more of a concern and danger to employers. However, with proper training, education, and implementation of new policies, employers can take a proactive approach in preventing this abuse.

(PRWEB) December 9, 2005 -- Johnny was frequently sick at work. And as such, Johnny always had stuff in his desk drawer and often visited the company’s first-aid-kit. Johnny was seen popping pills, drinking unknown tea concoctions and shots of cough syrup. In the workplace, we the employers have always been concerned with the on-company time and property use, sale and or distribution of marijuana, cocaine and crystal methamphetamines. But today, Sudafed, Vicks, Robitussen, and Tylenol Cold pills could be the newer, cheaper, over the counter (OTC) legally abused drugs, vitamins, and other type homeopathic remedies, and they’re being used right in front of our faces.

In prescribed or responsible doses these OTC’s will help in the curing process but in large doses it can cause heart attacks, seizures and in some circumstances death. Roboting or euphoria is the intended feeling for why these medicines are abused by people at work or in social settings. The attractive ingredient is DXM (Dextromethorphan Hydrobromide, DXM HBr) which is classified with dissociative anesthetics. These OTC’s come in ready to use forms, pills, tablets (to ingest or chop/snort), powder and the favorite, syrup. Heavy users of the syrup brands have been known to ingest about 3 – 4 bottles daily.

DXM can be purchased wherever cough suppressants are sold and in a pure form as a pill in Mexico and in all forms over the Internet. Additionally, the Internet provides easy to find instructions on how to extract DXM from gel-caps and syrups and thus enabling the person to ingest it orally (perhaps in soda or coffee) or to even inject it directly into ones system as heroin started its popularity in the 60’s.

In the 60’s, DXM replaced codeine and some of the opiates which were being abused by people then; so it’s been around for a long time. But today it is popular with the younger adults and adolescents and for the same reasonsit is easy to find and buy.

The effects of this type of high lasts for 4-8 hours depending on how it is ingested into the system and the form the DXM is in. Because of the side effects and the withdrawal symptoms which can be everything from vomiting to weight loss, addiction is not usually an end result. But as with other drugs, it may lead a person down the road to finding the ultimate drug for consumption and the high. Another method of use is when DXM is extracted and then mixed with MDMA (Ecstasy) or special K to produce a more intense experience and I don’t mean the cereal…

Future legislation may require identification henceforth for proof of age to purchase these basic OTC drugs. Certain measures have already been taken with the elimination of Efedra in weight loss pills and some abused steroids have been restricted from the high profile, semi- and professional athletes’ use.

In addition, this recreational abuse of the DXM has now tweaked the attention of many local, state and federal officials to increase the monitoring of its use and warnings to the consumer. They may pull it from the counters and place it back on the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) list of 1970 if the abuse warrants it’s rescheduling. As employers, our front-line supervisors need to be vigilant towards the consumption of these OTC’s by our employees. It is also our responsibility to institute appropriate substance abuse policies with the assistance from an employment law attorney. What we don’t want to be accused of is enabling Johnny to become an abuser or a long-term addict. But then what happens to those of us who use OTC’s responsiblyis it back to mom’s homemade chicken soup?


http://www.prweb.com/releases/2005/12/prweb320037.htm

rT::3000
12-10-2005, 12:07 PM
Originally posted by drdªv€@Dec 10 2005, 07:07 AM
Additionally, the Internet provides easy to find instructions on how to extract DXM from gel-caps and syrups and thus enabling the person to ingest it orally (perhaps in soda or coffee) or to even inject it directly into ones system as heroin started its popularity in the 60’s.
injecting dxm? :shake:

scaremongering at its finest... but yes, there are people dumb enough to try that anyways, which isn't so much a problem with dxm, but with the idiots themselves who try it.

i also noticed (you have to follow the link) that this was written by an employee of Diversified Risk Management, INC. which provides "Corporate undercover workplace investigation services" which furthers my theory of scaremongering employers into buying their services.

Cameron
12-10-2005, 04:22 PM
this has to be the worst case of bullshit ever. pills for chopping up and snorting? say what?

Arm
12-10-2005, 05:10 PM
This writing is so stiff and authoriterian it scares me. :cry:

Suburban_Prince
12-13-2005, 09:39 PM
omg that is some straight up BS right there, i dont even know where to start, like omfg how is it legal for them to publish such bullshit!?!? i dont even know where to start :crazy:

rT::3000
12-13-2005, 10:33 PM
Originally posted by Suburban_Prince@Dec 13 2005, 09:39 PM
omg that is some straight up BS right there, i dont even know where to start, like omfg how is it legal for them to publish such bullshit!?!? i dont even know where to start :crazy:
they wrote a press release and there is freedom of the press here. what they wrote was certainly inaccurate, but unless there was something libelous or slanderous (which there wasn't) there's not much anyone can do. their company is out to make money, so the odds of them issuing another press release to retract the previous one is unlikely.

shitty, ain't it? constitutional freedoms sure come with alot of caveats these days.

Shadow
12-13-2005, 11:47 PM
They may pull it from the counters and place it back on the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) list of 1970 if the abuse warrants it’s rescheduling.


DXM was scheduled? and doesnt this (http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/21/811.html) make it extremely hard to schedule?


(2) Dextromethorphan shall not be deemed to be included in any schedule by reason of enactment of this subchapter unless controlled after October 27, 1970 pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this section.

levomethorphan
12-15-2005, 05:13 PM
Originally posted by Shadow@Dec 13 2005, 11:47 PM

They may pull it from the counters and place it back on the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) list of 1970 if the abuse warrants it’s rescheduling.


DXM was scheduled? and doesnt this (http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/21/811.html) make it extremely hard to schedule?


(2) Dextromethorphan shall not be deemed to be included in any schedule by reason of enactment of this subchapter unless controlled after October 27, 1970 pursuant to the foregoing provisions of this section.

The exemption of DXM under the CSA does not hinder possible scheduling one bit. Dextromethorphan is the optical isomer of levomethorphan, which is a Schedule II substance, and since optical isomers of Schedule II substances are also Schedule II substances automatically, the exemption was necessary to keep it from being interpreted as a Schedule II substance. It has nothing to do with possible scheduling in the future.

However, dextrorphan (DXO) is not exempted, and as such, it *is* a Schedule II substance because it is the optical isomer of levorphanol, which is listed in Schedule II.

Vertigo
12-16-2005, 12:06 AM
I emailed the poster of said article and enlightened them to the errors.

Expect no change.

I will continue to be "Roboting or euphoria" :shake:

Vertigo
12-27-2005, 11:36 PM
I recieved a presponse in regards to my email to the article. It is as follows...


Dear Mr. Starkey,

Regarding Article: The Season of Over The Counter Abuse Has Begun

I appreciate your interest regarding the article, however, having a difference of opinions is not wrong. I have visited your website and viewed my article on your website. I understand your view point, but would greatly appreciate it if you could remove my article from your website. Thank you for your time concerning this matter.



Since I am not the maintainer of these forums, I have no power, but I did extended the olive branch of truth. I explained that we would work with her to present the proper information...as I am sure a great many of us would.